Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fallback to BKS when JKS is not available #1504

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 21, 2021
Merged

Fallback to BKS when JKS is not available #1504

merged 1 commit into from Jan 21, 2021

Conversation

LittleFox94
Copy link
Contributor

This is the case on e.g. Android. BKS is BouncyCastles JKS-compatible implementation of a KeyStore

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 20, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @LittleFox94!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-client/java 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-client/java has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 20, 2021
@LittleFox94
Fallback to BKS when JKS is not available
7e8ca08 
This is the case on e.g. Android. BKS is BouncyCastles JKS-compatible implementation of a KeyStore
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, LittleFox94

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 21, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 248d384 into kubernetes-client:master Jan 21, 2021
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
Closed
Merged
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@brendandburns brendandburns Awaiting requested review from brendandburns

@yue9944882 yue9944882 Awaiting requested review from yue9944882

Assignees

@brendandburns brendandburns

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@LittleFox94 @k8s-ci-robot @brendandburns