Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

developer meeting experiment #1319

Open
clux opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

developer meeting experiment #1319

clux opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
discussions possibly more of a discussion piece than an issue

Comments

@clux
Copy link
Member

clux commented Oct 23, 2023

One of the few pieces of feedback that I personally think is sensible to take on-board from CNCF as suggestions, is having some form of less formal means of real-time communication.

We've never had this before, and we get by, but a lot of the more difficult issues on here can sometimes stagnate when:

  1. collective maintainer bandwidth is limited (and we prefer solving the easy issue/qa of the week)
  2. it can be hard to engage with issues that we don't feel like we have the full context of

And i think it's valid to be able to talk about issues and direction in a less formal and less daunting way than github issues, to get pointers on where to start and to maybe seek out an exploratory consensus without writing an RFC equivalent.

I also do think we have a lot of (potentially deteriorating) knowledge and assumptions on "what we'd like things to be like" that we don't always express because it's a lot of effort to write it all down and justify formally. Particularly since this is basically volunteer work.

Proposal

a meeting, fortnightly, with minutes, google doc for next session's agenda that we all can plop things into*. running it for a 3mo period as an experiment.

Intent: for dev related work and directional planning / exploration, not for issue Q/A ideally (there's enough channels for that and they benefit from searchability) - but some of that is also probably unavoidable.

basically; an optional maintainer-run thing for when time allows (if no-one can / or nothing in the agenda we cancel). I am happy to try to run during an initial experiment (with the caveat that it has to be during EU daytime for a while for me for a while).

would any one of you find that valuable, or would you consider joining this at times?

tagging @kube-rs/maintainers and @kube-rs/triagewrite to query interest
to be clear: none of you should feel compelled to do this. feel free to 👍 or 👎 without ceremony.

if you do find this valuable, please say so. will try to schedule based on our preferences or time constraints, but ideally we leave a resulting meeting open so that other people wanting to contribute / join in can.

@clux clux added the discussions possibly more of a discussion piece than an issue label Oct 23, 2023
@nightkr
Copy link
Member

nightkr commented Nov 6, 2023

Didn't see this (sorry!) but it seems like a good idea to me.

@soenkeliebau
Copy link
Contributor

I concur, sounds like a good thing to try!

@Dav1dde
Copy link
Member

Dav1dde commented Nov 6, 2023

👍

@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Nov 21, 2023

Have setup a google doc for meeting tracking it should link to a calendar event that you should be able to join in. Hope google stack is ok for this.

Have copied a template somewhere so far so there's access for people to add in stuff.

LMK access troubles / hard maintainer time conflicts (if you want to join). Plan on moving it a bit later come January anyway though.

EDIT: updated event into a new calendar that's public (hopefully works now)

@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Nov 23, 2023

Supplying a calendar link seems to be a better way; so here is the kube-rs calendar.

@Dav1dde Dav1dde assigned Dav1dde and unassigned Dav1dde Dec 5, 2023
@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Feb 7, 2024

Based on requests have moved this to Thursdays same time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussions possibly more of a discussion piece than an issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants