Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Consensus] Suggestion about Sticky policy #1788

Open
hyunsooda opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[Consensus] Suggestion about Sticky policy #1788

hyunsooda opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or enhancement

Comments

@hyunsooda
Copy link
Contributor

Among the three policies, Sticky policy is designed to anchor only one proposer. If this policy were to be not deprecated in the future, it would be beneficial to have a way to select a desired validator. If the Sticky policy is to be retained, it can be implemented based on the governance item rather than by adding a field to genesis.json, which would be overengineering.

The use case of the Sticky policy may vary depending on the desired purpose. In my case, specifically, this policy greatly reduces voting-related testing time. Say there are 100 validators and round-robin is used for proposer selection, when one validator votes, they have to wait for 100 seconds to insert the vote when they are supposed to generate a block in some round. This is quite time-consuming.

@exalate-issue-sync
Copy link

Exalate commented: Issue Created by: hyunsooda

@sjnam sjnam added enhancement New feature or enhancement and removed Github labels Sep 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants