Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snyk workflow failure #27761

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
miquelsi opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #27767 or #27866
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Snyk workflow failure #27761

miquelsi opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #27767 or #27866
Assignees

Comments

@miquelsi
Copy link
Contributor

Before reporting an issue

  • I have read and understood the above terms for submitting issues, and I understand that my issue may be closed without action if I do not follow them.

Area

ci

Describe the bug

https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/actions/runs/8225767483/job/22491254466

Error: Code Scanning could not process the submitted SARIF file:
could not convert rules: invalid security severity value, is not a number: undefined
Error: Code Scanning could not process the submitted SARIF file:
could not convert rules: invalid security severity value, is not a number: undefined
    at Object.waitForProcessing (/home/runner/work/_actions/github/codeql-action/v3/lib/upload-lib.js:359:27)
    at async run (/home/runner/work/_actions/github/codeql-action/v3/lib/upload-sarif-action.js:58:13)
    at async runWrapper (/home/runner/work/_actions/github/codeql-action/v3/lib/upload-sarif-action.js:76:9)

Version

latest

Regression

  • The issue is a regression

Expected behavior

Actual behavior

How to Reproduce?

Anything else?

No response

@abstractj
Copy link
Contributor

Caused by github/codeql-action#2187

abstractj added a commit to abstractj/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
abstractj added a commit to abstractj/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
abstractj added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
Closes #27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
@abstractj abstractj reopened this Mar 11, 2024
@abstractj abstractj self-assigned this Mar 11, 2024
abstractj added a commit to abstractj/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
abstractj added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2024
Closes #27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
abstractj added a commit to abstractj/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
abstractj added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2024
Closes #27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
markbanierink pushed a commit to markbanierink/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
markbanierink pushed a commit to markbanierink/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
ahus1 pushed a commit to ahus1/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
ahus1 pushed a commit to ahus1/keycloak that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2024
Closes keycloak#27761

Signed-off-by: Bruno Oliveira da Silva <bruno@abstractj.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants