Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I believe it should |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Sounds good! Maybe we can even consolidate related
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
During review of #11120 I've noticed that there is a following signature in
MapClientEntity
:Shouldn't it rather be
Set<MapProtocolMapperEntity> getProtocolMappers();
to avoid storing ids twice?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions