Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve readme (e.g. explain JSON5 better!) #291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2022
Merged

Improve readme (e.g. explain JSON5 better!) #291

merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2022

Conversation

aseemk
Copy link
Member

@aseemk aseemk commented Oct 1, 2022

Aims to fix #285:

  • Explain JSON5 better. Proactively emphasize that this is for config file type use cases, not machine-to-machine communication (the #1 misunderstanding or objection to JSON5).

  • Market/sell it better. The stats and company/project names are exciting! =)

  • Link to blog post. This doesn't need to be front-and-center though; just added it to my name in the credits.

  • Emphasize ES5 compatibility. Just put a stake in the ground here and preempt feature requests we'll never accept.

* Explain JSON5 better. Proactively emphasize that this is for config file type use cases, not machine-to-machine communication (the #1 misunderstanding or objection to JSON5).

* Market/sell it better. The stats and company/project names are exciting! =)

* Link to blog post. This doesn't need to be front-and-center though; just added it to my name in the credits.

* Emphasize ES5 compatibility. Just put a stake in the ground here and preempt feature requests we'll never accept.
@aseemk
Copy link
Member Author

aseemk commented Oct 1, 2022

WDYT @jordanbtucker? I'll go ahead merge this since it's harmless and easy to iterate on post-merge too, but feedback welcome!

@aseemk aseemk merged commit d720b4f into main Oct 1, 2022
@aseemk aseemk deleted the aseem/intro branch October 1, 2022 16:43
@aseemk
Copy link
Member Author

aseemk commented Oct 1, 2022

Also see 97286f8

@jordanbtucker
Copy link
Member

@aseemk Thank you for this, and sorry for taking so long to respond. Marketing is not my strong suit, so I appreciate the excellent updates to the README. My only critique is that JSON5 is technically not a strict subset of ES5 in the same way that JSON is not a strict subset of ES5—JSON5 and JSON allow U+2028 and U+2029 characters in strings while ES5 does not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Explain use cases front and center
2 participants