We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Now that #751 is merged, there's no reason to have a fallback for fs.copyFile/fs.copyFileSync. We should remove them from the copy implementation.
fs.copyFile
fs.copyFileSync
copy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@manidlou are you up to this, or shall I do it?
Sorry, something went wrong.
@RyanZim I will take care of it. I really appreciate all your work!
manidlou
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Now that #751 is merged, there's no reason to have a fallback for
fs.copyFile
/fs.copyFileSync
. We should remove them from thecopy
implementation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: