Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minimum Java version support for home modules #6172

Closed
jmcc0nn3ll opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Minimum Java version support for home modules #6172

jmcc0nn3ll opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Documentation Enhancement Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests
Milestone

Comments

@jmcc0nn3ll
Copy link
Contributor

Jetty version
Jetty 10 - Jetty 11

Java version
Java 16+

OS type/version
N/A

Description
Now that additional features are really starting to show up in incremental releases of Java releases, we should have a mechanism in our module system that allows for a minimum java version for the enabling and execution of a module. On the enabling side we should test the java version and fail if it isn't sufficient to enable. On the execution side we should fail the start up if the module is enabled but the executing java version is not sufficient indicating the user setup the base with one java version and tried to start it with another one that doesn't carry the feature.

This would require updates to the documentation as well.

@sbordet
Copy link
Contributor

sbordet commented Apr 15, 2021

Rather than a new section in *.mod files, we can use the "runtime feature" introduced in #5492 that we currently use in Jetty 9.4.x for ALPN, where we have alpn-available-[true|false].mod files.

@WalkerWatch WalkerWatch removed their assignment Jan 3, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been a
full year without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Jan 4, 2023
@sbordet sbordet removed the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Jan 8, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been a
full year without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Jan 9, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

This issue has been closed due to it having no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Enhancement Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants