New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
asymmetric matcher type definitions are not good (yet again) #550
Comments
PR welcome to fix it 👍 |
/cc @rluvaton |
Sorry 😬 Could you create a repro repo so I could take a look at it later today and fix it |
I don't know how the current AsymmetricMatchers types works As you can see in: The return type is |
wil do |
@rluvaton negative. now I have
|
@rluvaton built-in asymmetric matchers (like |
Where do you see that? |
change to any, could you please retry? |
My guess is that they're |
perfection 👍 |
thanks, so it's ready for review 😄 |
After the recent change, cannot be used as nested in
jest
.See this comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: