Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(expect-expect): support additionalTestBlockFunctions option #850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2021

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented May 28, 2021

Helps with #534

Probably wants to be replaced with just testBlockFunctions at some point when we decide we want to support settings.
Could be worth doing now - haven't decided 馃

@G-Rath G-Rath force-pushed the expect-expect-additional-test-blocks branch from ae7c8b2 to 8e00541 Compare June 19, 2021 21:50
@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator Author

G-Rath commented Sep 25, 2021

(this is sort of on hold as I started looking at how we can implement this & the other general naming stuff as settings, then learnt that ESLint handles settings weirdly, which will change in the new config system).

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator Author

G-Rath commented Oct 14, 2021

Going to merge because it's fine and a good thing for extending libraries, and who knows when I'm going to get back to the settings stuff.

@G-Rath G-Rath merged commit 3b94c62 into main Oct 14, 2021
@G-Rath G-Rath deleted the expect-expect-additional-test-blocks branch October 14, 2021 21:23
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
# [25.2.0](v25.1.0...v25.2.0) (2021-10-14)

### Features

* **expect-expect:** support `additionalTestBlockFunctions` option ([#850](#850)) ([3b94c62](3b94c62))
@github-actions
Copy link

馃帀 This PR is included in version 25.2.0 馃帀

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 馃摝馃殌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant