We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CVE-2020-15522 might be false negative on library for org.bouncycastle:bc-fips:1.0.2. CVE-2019-20477 ,CVE-2020-14343 and CVE-2020-1747 might be false negative on library for PyYAML:5.1.2 .
These CVEs are not reported by Dependency-check tool but reported by other open-source tools like Trivy.
Is this CVE actually belongs to org.bouncycastle:bc-fips:1.0.2 as per information on few sites? If yes, then it is false negative issue.
<dependency> <groupId>org.bouncycastle</groupId> <artifactId>bc-fips</artifactId> <version>1.0.2</version> </dependency>
PyYAML:5.1.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bc-fips vulnerability is properly detected (Maven plugin 7.1.0). Not sure how to properly validate the PyYAML CVEs, maybe you can retest?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
CVE-2020-15522 might be false negative on library for org.bouncycastle:bc-fips:1.0.2.
CVE-2019-20477 ,CVE-2020-14343 and CVE-2020-1747 might be false negative on library for PyYAML:5.1.2 .
These CVEs are not reported by Dependency-check tool but reported by other open-source tools like Trivy.
Is this CVE actually belongs to org.bouncycastle:bc-fips:1.0.2 as per information on few sites? If yes, then it is false negative issue.
PyYAML:5.1.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: