Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove AppVeyor use? #1230

Closed
jezdez opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1223
Closed

Remove AppVeyor use? #1230

jezdez opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1223
Assignees
Labels
ci Related to continuous integration tasks question User question

Comments

@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented Nov 20, 2020

#1229 has removed the use of Travis-CI in favor of the GitHub Actions setup, which also supports Windows.

I've already removed the pull request merge requirement for AppVeyor following the discussion there.

Should we remove AppVeyor completely?

Refs: jazzband/help#74

@atugushev
Copy link
Member

I'm in. See also #1223.

@davidovich
Copy link
Contributor

I'm for it in theory. Github actions model is very nice, and having only one ci provider is simpler.

@vphilippon
Copy link
Member

Agreed on my side too. If we have our needs covered (which I think we do), then 👍 .

@atugushev atugushev added the ci Related to continuous integration tasks label Nov 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci Related to continuous integration tasks question User question
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants