Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please include JSR305 into the project #50

Open
remal opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 10 comments
Open

Please include JSR305 into the project #50

remal opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 10 comments

Comments

@remal
Copy link

remal commented Jul 23, 2019

I have Java 11 project and struggling from "split-package" issue (the first link in Google leads here). Please consider merging JSR205 (common annotations) with JSR305 to help users to avoid this problem.

You can use com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 as reference JSR305 implementation.

@remal
Copy link
Author

remal commented Aug 3, 2020

@m0mus, @lukasj, @rotty3000 and other maintainers, what do you think? Are there any discussions or plans?

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor

lukasj commented Aug 3, 2020

we're busy with getting EE 9 out, this will be revisited once that is done.

@jameskleeh
Copy link

@lukasj Has this been revisited?

@gilbertoca
Copy link

gilbertoca commented Sep 6, 2021

@lukasj Has this been revisited?

It seems they are busy again. @lukasj @jameskleeh @remal
I've seen a good PR by @michael-schnell #91 , but it seems it is huge problem to solve.

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor

lukasj commented Sep 6, 2021

have you seen #89 ? what else do you need and why?

@jameskleeh
Copy link

@lukasj Glad to see it! When can we expect to get a release that contains those annotations?

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor

lukasj commented Sep 6, 2021

I'm not the right person to answer that. For general schedule, see https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/jakartaee-platform/jakartaee10/JakartaEE10#jakarta-ee-10-schedule

@michael-schnell
Copy link

Anyone to review #91 ?

@cowwoc
Copy link

cowwoc commented Oct 26, 2021

#91 just got closed as WON'T FIX but as mentioned plenty of people need this functionality. So what's the plan? Will someone reimplement the annotations from scratch (ideally with the same class names as IDEs depend on them)?

@m0mus
Copy link
Contributor

m0mus commented Oct 27, 2021

As far as I understand it, there are license issues and the author from Google doesn't want to help. The only option is to reimplement these annotations. Feel free to do it and introduce a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants