Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ipfs pin: add ability to search/filter by name #10281

Closed
hacdias opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10412
Closed

ipfs pin: add ability to search/filter by name #10281

hacdias opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10412
Labels
dif/medium effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue P3 Low: Not priority right now

Comments

@hacdias
Copy link
Member

hacdias commented Jan 8, 2024

Now that we have support for pin names (#10261), it would be great if you add the ability to search by pin name. Boxo already contains an index based on names. Even if that would not be useful, a updating the current ipfs pin ls to support an additional option (e.g. --search {keywords}) and filter the outputted pins based on it could be beneficial.

@hacdias hacdias added help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours dif/medium labels Jan 8, 2024
@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Jan 8, 2024

I checked what we did in remote pinning years ago, and it uses --name for filtering:

$ ipfs pin remote ls --help
[..]
--name     string - Return pins with names that contain the value provided (case-sensitive, exact match)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dif/medium effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue P3 Low: Not priority right now
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants