Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Peers screen to use ipfs-geoip v9.0.0 #2055

Closed
2 tasks done
lidel opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2061
Closed
2 tasks done

Update Peers screen to use ipfs-geoip v9.0.0 #2055

lidel opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2061
Assignees
Labels
area/screen/peers Issues related to Peers screen exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up released

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Oct 21, 2022

@whizzzkid since you were already involved, mind propagating update to ipfs-webui?

This is lower priority, fine to do it after Lisbon, but we want to include this in Kubo 0.17 which will ship ~2weeks after Lisbon

@lidel lidel added exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo area/screen/peers Issues related to Peers screen labels Oct 21, 2022
@ipfs-gui-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.20.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/screen/peers Issues related to Peers screen exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up released
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants