Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DHCP客户端的Vendor Class能否改进一下 #974

Open
1 task done
13528943945 opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
1 task done

DHCP客户端的Vendor Class能否改进一下 #974

13528943945 opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@13528943945
Copy link

13528943945 commented Jun 8, 2023

捕获

Describe the bug

最近爱快的新版本,dhcp协议,Vendor Class部分多了字符串及十六进制的选项,这极大方便了玩iptv(ipoe方式接入)的朋友。openwrt这边也可以ipoe,只不过需要改dhcp脚本,略显麻烦。能否借鉴爱快的方法?将抓包后的dhcp60的值(16进制)直接填入Vendor Class并指明16进制。这样不改/lib/netifd/proto/dhcp.sh脚本,就能获取到10开头的iptv内网地址

ImmortalWrt version

all

ImmortalWrt target/subtarget

all

Device

all

Image kind

Official downloaded image

Steps to reproduce

No response

Actual behaviour

No response

Expected behaviour

No response

Additional info

No response

Diffconfig

No response

Terms

  • I am reporting an issue for ImmortalWrt, not an unsupported fork.
@13528943945 13528943945 added the bug issue report with a confirmed bug label Jun 8, 2023
@1715173329 1715173329 removed the bug issue report with a confirmed bug label Jun 8, 2023
@1715173329 1715173329 changed the title 不是BUG!DHCP客户端的Vendor Class能否改进一下 DHCP客户端的Vendor Class能否改进一下 Jun 8, 2023
@1715173329
Copy link
Member

PR is welcome

@windybird
Copy link

这个地方要智能点就好了

@1715173329 1715173329 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 11, 2023
@ROOOCCCK

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@PrestarLin

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@ciegyet
Copy link

ciegyet commented Feb 26, 2024

臣附议!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants