Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delegated identities beeing rewarded by qualifying as well as reporting their poolmates flips #998

Open
ubiubi18 opened this issue Jul 30, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ubiubi18
Copy link

ubiubi18 commented Jul 30, 2022

The author of flip https://scan.idena.io/flip/bafkreid67l2vagop4mx5tk6bw4nn2qwjdfhgcfitg3g2ju3xax4o2wiigi
(identity A = https://scan.idena.io/identity/0xbE0064feD0E1c0682fEEbc147392F7d5325c8C42)

is a delegate of Pool https://scan.idena.io/pool/0x96d11da40FDe82D81ebE0EAE61bFe6a47F43d1a6

just like 2 out of 7 identities out of the qualification committee
( Indentity B https://scan.idena.io/identity/0x6422C0e7a1B25fE8A9ec2168cC87b67F57EB9e5A and Identity C https://scan.idena.io/identity/0xE0EB33Ef69dFC8cBBacF03e014A619a3D95FCbb3 )

This is not how it was announced to be in https://medium.com/idena/idena-proof-of-person-blockchain-to-eliminate-risks-of-mining-pools-74d96e16aa36 where we can read:

"Pool’s accounts will not be able to solve flips created by other accounts delegated to the same pool."

In case that this is unavoidable for technical reason, there is still another problem:

Identity B did approve that flip of Identity A, while Identity C did report it.

That way identity C made about 7.68 idna reporting rewards for Identity As bad flip.

That is like a hedge against the penalty and contradicts the idea of incentifying better flips with the report mechanism?

@Ed-Relight
Copy link

Flips.txt
Can confirm the issue, the attached file is the list of 3715 flips made and solved by the delegates of the same pools (Validation epoch 93)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants