The logic of validation summarization needs to be changed

[an-trader]

The logic of validation summarization needs to be changed.
Identity 22-23 epoch.
Status: Suspended.
https://scan.idena.io/identity/0x5F52EC2660522fe6CEae0931bEd567A87B0dd387/epoch/106/validation#shortAnswers
Short session - 6 flips of which only 1 flip is not solved correctly.
However, Identity was eliminated because 4 correctly solved flips received a report and two remaining flips participated in the count: one solved correctly, the second not solved correctly.

I believe that correctly solved flips should be counted in the counts, even if they get a report.
Because a flip can be clear and easy to solve, but receive a report due to a keyword mismatch.
Whoever solved such a flip should not be hurt.

But improperly solved flips that received a report should not be counted in the count, because a flip can be completely undecidable because of the wrong pictures, and then the report can save the person who received that undecidable flip.

[teavar]

improperly solved flips

Do you mean flips with weak consensus?

[do2050]

Two of the Identity killed because ( Suspended and then failed )because of this stupid mistake they were ages +20