Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No JSON/RPC endpoint exists to determine which EVM version a permissioned chain is using #7064

Open
matthew1001 opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7127
Open

No JSON/RPC endpoint exists to determine which EVM version a permissioned chain is using #7064

matthew1001 opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7127
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@matthew1001
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The admin_nodeInfo JSON/RPC method returns the configuration of a node which includes its fork schedule, but you have to manually derive which schedule is in use by correlating it with the chain's block height and/or timestamp.

It would be useful to have a JSON/RPC method that returned the EVM version in use for the latest block.

One additional enhancement would be the ability to specify a block number and get back the EVM version in use at that block height, but the use-case for that is less clear than for latest

Acceptance Criteria

A JSON/RPC method exists to determine the EVM version in use on the current/latest block height.

@matthew1001 matthew1001 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 7, 2024
@matthew1001 matthew1001 self-assigned this May 7, 2024
@matthew1001 matthew1001 changed the title No JSON/RPC endpoint to determine which EVM version a permissioned chain is using No JSON/RPC endpoint exists to determine which EVM version a permissioned chain is using May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant