(powershell) Three official-approved VALID_VERBS not been highlighted

[davidhcefx]

Describe the issue
In the list of the official-approved verbs, there are three of them not included in the VALID_VERBS:

highlight.js/src/languages/powershell.js

Lines 27 to 39 in 1e0cc76

	// https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714428(v=vs.85).aspx
	const VALID_VERBS =
	'Add|Clear|Close|Copy|Enter|Exit|Find|Format|Get|Hide|Join|Lock|' +
	'Move|New|Open|Optimize|Pop|Push|Redo|Remove|Rename|Reset|Resize|' +
	'Search|Select|Set|Show|Skip|Split|Step|Switch|Undo|Unlock|' +
	'Watch|Backup|Checkpoint|Compare|Compress|Convert|ConvertFrom|' +
	'ConvertTo|Dismount|Edit|Expand|Export|Group|Import|Initialize|' +
	'Limit|Merge|Out|Publish|Restore|Save|Sync|Unpublish|Update|' +
	'Approve|Assert|Complete|Confirm|Deny|Disable|Enable|Install|Invoke|Register|' +
	'Request|Restart|Resume|Start|Stop|Submit|Suspend|Uninstall|' +
	'Unregister|Wait|Debug|Measure|Ping|Repair|Resolve|Test|Trace|Connect|' +
	'Disconnect|Read|Receive|Send|Write|Block|Grant|Protect|Revoke|Unblock|' +
	'Unprotect|Use|ForEach|Sort|Tee|Where';

Those are:

• Mount
• Build
• Deploy

By the way, the provided link doesn't work anymore. Please change to a workable link, for instance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/developer/cmdlet/approved-verbs-for-windows-powershell-commands

Which language seems to have the issue?

powershell

Are you using highlight or highlightAuto?

Sample Code to Reproduce

Mount-DiskImage -ImagePath "E:\ISO-Files\My US Visit Fall 2010 Pictures.iso"

Expected behavior

• Mount-DiskImage being recognized as a whole built-in:

Mount-DiskImage -ImagePath "E:\ISO-Files\My US Visit Fall 2010 Pictures.iso"

Additional context

[joshgoebel]

Thanks. Looks like a good first issue. Would you like to try making a PR?

[davidhcefx]

Done.
BTW, when building the code with docker, I found a typo in the document:

If your preference is for another port, you can do that too:
docker run -d --name highlight-js --rm -p 80:8080 highlight-js

To my understanding, I think it should be 8080:80 instead? The first number is for the host, and I think most people would change that part to 8080.