Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

custom load balancer declarative configuration #17482

Merged

Conversation

sancar
Copy link
Contributor

@sancar sancar commented Sep 3, 2020

Fixes #17228

Changes:

"custom" balancer type was introduced (as suggested)
XML, YAML config loading supports new balancer type
Spring bean class name or reference is also supported for "custom" type

(cherry picked from commit 281c7ad)
(cherry picked from commit 06589f2)
… exclusive

load balancer client config xml and yaml examples updated

(cherry picked from commit dac66e2)
@sancar sancar added Type: Defect Team: Client Backport Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee labels Sep 3, 2020
@sancar sancar added this to the 4.0.3 milestone Sep 3, 2020
@sancar sancar requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2020 13:01
@sancar sancar self-assigned this Sep 3, 2020
@sancar sancar force-pushed the fix/load_balancer_xml_configuration/4.0.z branch from 65ebd5b to 38b49e5 Compare September 3, 2020 14:25
@sancar sancar mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2020
@sancar sancar force-pushed the fix/load_balancer_xml_configuration/4.0.z branch from 38b49e5 to bf96ce1 Compare September 3, 2020 14:40
@sancar sancar force-pushed the fix/load_balancer_xml_configuration/4.0.z branch from bf96ce1 to b89e969 Compare September 3, 2020 14:41
@sancar sancar merged commit 1213400 into hazelcast:4.0.z Sep 4, 2020
@sancar sancar deleted the fix/load_balancer_xml_configuration/4.0.z branch September 4, 2020 13:29
@hazelcast hazelcast deleted a comment Sep 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants