Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Postgres revocation sql, beta mode #1972

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 5, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jefferai
Copy link
Member

@jefferai jefferai commented Oct 5, 2016

No description provided.

@jefferai jefferai added this to the 0.6.2 milestone Oct 5, 2016
Copy link
Member

@vishalnayak vishalnayak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question, but it LGTM.

string, a serialized JSON string array, or a base64-encoded serialized
JSON string array. The '{{name}}' and '{{password}}' values will be
substituted.
</li>
<li>
<span class="param">revocation_sql</span>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to add an additional warning that this parameter will be run "as-is" here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can change this later if we want; I think due to the similarity with the sql parameter it should be pretty obvious.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me.

@jefferai jefferai merged commit 37df43d into master Oct 5, 2016
@jefferai jefferai deleted the postgres-revocation-sql branch December 16, 2016 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants