types: Migrate type implementations into basetypes subpackage #567
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #91
Aliasing and function shadowing in the original
types
package should prevent most provider developer changes. The main exception is the newer type-specificTypable
andValuable
interfaces were moved without a type alias. This should help developers find the necessary interfaces for custom types next to the base type implementations.The underlying implementation of the primitive types (
BoolType
,Float64Type
,Int64Type
,NumberType
, andStringType
) are now fully exported types instead of the unexportedprimitive
type which was difficult to extend.The underlying value type creation functions were prefixed with New and the value types themselves were renamed to include Value at the end. This should prevent rough edges with the
String
value type since it conflicted with theString()
method and could not be directly embedded easily.