Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make iso_file more configurable #119

Open
rossmaclean opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Make iso_file more configurable #119

rossmaclean opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rossmaclean
Copy link
Contributor

Community Note

Please vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.

Description

When creating a VM, I can specify iso_file but no other configuration e.g. device. I can, however, specify this if I use the additional_iso_files array. The issue is that iso_file is mandatory, but does not let me configure it correctly.

Use Case(s)

My specific setup is running Proxmox on a Raspberry Pi. The issue I have is that the ISO has to be a scsi device, but the required iso_file attaches it as ide.

Potential configuration

I can see three potential ways that this could be fixed (this is not exhaustive, I'm sure there are other solutions):

  1. Make iso_file* optional
    • Would avoid breaking existing configurations that people have
  2. Make iso_file* optional with additional_iso_files i.e. require one of them
    • I think this would be the best option, as it won't break people's current configurations
  3. Remove iso_file* and use additional_iso_files
    • I think this would be the ideal solution as I don't really understand why the first ISO is treated special instead of just part of the list of ISOs, but would probably break a lot of exisiting configurations
    • It would also probably make sense for additional_iso_files to be renamed to iso_files in this case

* When I say iso_file I am also referring to the other fields that accompany it e.g. iso_url, iso_storage_pool, iso_checksum

Potential References

Documentation for iso_file
Documentation for additional_iso_files

@rossmaclean rossmaclean added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 8, 2022
@nywilken nywilken transferred this issue from hashicorp/packer-plugin-proxmox Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant