Create microsoft-support.md #1316
Conversation
|
CC @srini100 |
microsoft-support.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Notes: | ||
| * Applications must be using a [currently supported .NET release](https://dotnet.microsoft.com/platform/support/policy). | ||
| * Minimum supported grpc-dotnet version is v2.37.0. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will you bump up the min version in future for any reason?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes. This number is incremented when new .NET versions are released. For example, when .NET 7 is released we'll increment the min version to the version referencing in the new project gRPC template. e.g. .NET 7 template references 2.45.0, which will become the new minimum.
Edit: Clarified in PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(this number should be updated to v2.40.0, which is used by .NET 6 and was released since this document was written)
|
@thisisnotapril please review (to make sure this doc is compatible with CNCF's project requirements). |
| * dotnet-grpc | ||
|
|
||
| Notes: | ||
| * Applications must be using a [currently supported .NET release](https://dotnet.microsoft.com/platform/support/policy). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
.NET Native (UWP) support isn't called out on that page. Would that follow the same as .NET Framework where as long as it ships with Windows OS it'll be supported?
|
I'm going to close this. If it turns out it is desired then will reopen and address feedback. |
JamesNK
force-pushed
the
JamesNK-patch-1
branch
from
b05b645 to
770dc08
Compare
|
@jtattermusch Outstanding feedback answered. |
microsoft-support.md
Outdated
| * Patches are provided (for free) as required for functional or security issues, typically [every 6 weeks](doc/release_process.md). | ||
| * You can [contact Microsoft support to request help](https://support.serviceshub.microsoft.com/supportforbusiness/onboarding) (potentially at a cost). | ||
|
|
||
| You can also request community support on GitHub (for free), but there is no guarantee of a quick reply. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: while "but there is no guarantee of a quick reply" is mostly true, I'm wondering if it makes community support (or the "official" gRPC support mentioned in the first paragraph, but not mentioned here) sound as a subpar alternative - and we don't want the users to interpret it as such. Can we simply add a note what the alternatives are (e.g. official support from gRPC team maintainers / community support) and refrain from statements that can be interpreted as assessing quality of some of the alternatives?
@jtattermusch The support document I mentioned.