Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add JRuby to the testing matrix for travis #140

Open
LightGuard opened this issue Jul 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Add JRuby to the testing matrix for travis #140

LightGuard opened this issue Jul 24, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@LightGuard
Copy link

JRuby should be tested via Travis. Rubinus wouldn't be a bad idea either.

@grosser
Copy link
Owner

grosser commented Jul 25, 2015

Good idea, want to make a PR ?

@LightGuard
Copy link
Author

Which versions do you want to test against?

On Friday, July 24, 2015, Michael Grosser notifications@github.com wrote:

Good idea, want to make a PR ?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#140 (comment).

Sent from Gmail Mobile

@grosser
Copy link
Owner

grosser commented Jul 25, 2015

Newest stable
On Jul 24, 2015 5:42 PM, "Jason Porter" notifications@github.com wrote:

Which versions do you want to test against?

On Friday, July 24, 2015, Michael Grosser notifications@github.com
wrote:

Good idea, want to make a PR ?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#140 (comment).

Sent from Gmail Mobile


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#140 (comment).

LightGuard added a commit to LightGuard/parallel that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2015
This adds JRuby in 1.9 mode (which should track the 1.7 branch) and also JRuby 9000 which was recently released (it's ruby 2.2.2). These are run on three different JVMs as well. It should also test against Rubinus 2.

There's also no point in testing on the different jvms for straight-up mri so those combinations are excluded.
@jtoy
Copy link

jtoy commented Nov 25, 2017

so jruby is officially supported?

@grosser
Copy link
Owner

grosser commented Nov 25, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants