You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have our own tagging scheme, and would like release-please to create releases and PRs based on our own tags.
Detailed design
Today, we have a scheme (a bit similar to conventional commits), but we check for specific words in the PR title, such as "major", "minor", and "patch".
Once the pull request is merged, we create the tag.
It seems release-please only keeps track of what releases were created. So, for example, if we have release 1.2.3, but we have now merged 10 pull requests, so we are on tag 1.3.9 - for example - we'd like release-please to create a release based on that tag version, and not 1.3.0.
Or if there's some other way to tell release-please to adhere to this pattern.
I've only found bump-minor-pre-major, ump-patch-for-minor-pre-major, include-v-in-tag, and include-component-in-tag but don't think this solves our use case.
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TL;DR
We have our own tagging scheme, and would like release-please to create releases and PRs based on our own tags.
Detailed design
Today, we have a scheme (a bit similar to conventional commits), but we check for specific words in the PR title, such as "major", "minor", and "patch".
Once the pull request is merged, we create the tag.
It seems release-please only keeps track of what releases were created. So, for example, if we have release 1.2.3, but we have now merged 10 pull requests, so we are on tag 1.3.9 - for example - we'd like release-please to create a release based on that tag version, and not 1.3.0.
Something like:
create-release-based-on-latest-tag: true
Or if there's some other way to tell release-please to adhere to this pattern.
I've only found
bump-minor-pre-major
,ump-patch-for-minor-pre-major
,include-v-in-tag
, andinclude-component-in-tag
but don't think this solves our use case.Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: