Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(spanner/spannertest): support USING clause in JOIN #2995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2020
Merged

feat(spanner/spannertest): support USING clause in JOIN #2995

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2020

Conversation

dsymonds
Copy link
Contributor

This involves a significant refactor of joinIter, which should now be
clearer and simpler, and keep the join condition (ON/USING/none)
orthogonal to the join type (LEFT/RIGHT/INNER/CROSS/FULL).

@dsymonds dsymonds added the api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. label Oct 10, 2020
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Oct 10, 2020
This involves a significant refactor of joinIter, which should now be
clearer and simpler, and keep the join condition (ON/USING/none)
orthogonal to the join type (LEFT/RIGHT/INNER/CROSS/FULL).
@dsymonds dsymonds added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Oct 13, 2020
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 69ed6f8 into googleapis:master Oct 13, 2020
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Oct 13, 2020
@dsymonds dsymonds deleted the spannertest-join-using branch October 13, 2020 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants