Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation missing for built-in serializers #620

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2441
Open

Documentation missing for built-in serializers #620

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2441

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

https://sites.google.com/site/gson/gson-user-guide#TOC-Built-in-Serializers-and-
Deserializers

The documentation reads:

"Built-in Serializers and Deserializers

Gson has built-in serializers and deserializers for commonly used classes whose 
default representation may be inappropriate. 

Here is a list of such classes: 

1. java.net.URL to match it with strings like 
"http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/".
2. java.net.URI to match it with strings like "/p/google-gson/".
You can also find source-code for some commonly used classes such as JodaTime 
at this page."


Notice that there is no "list of such classes". And I haven't any idea what was 
meant by those numbers items 1 and 2. I suspect it's a documentation template 
issue?

In any case, it seems important to document what the built-in serializers and 
deserializers are. I came looking for this documentation and can't find any.

(This is on the current google code site as of this writing, no particular 
version)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by derrick....@hp.com on 15 Jan 2015 at 5:07

@inder123
Copy link
Collaborator

inder123 commented Nov 8, 2015

Feel free to send a pull request with this documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants