C++: Add option to skip verifying nested flatbuffers #7489
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Additionally, add an options struct to the verifier for those who prefer designated initializers to default arguments. The former constructor is defined in terms of the latter because in old c++, having default values for members removes list initialization, making defining constructors in the other way a lot more challenging to write.
added 2 commits
August 29, 2022 17:10
added 2 commits
August 29, 2022 17:45
dbaileychess
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Additionally, add an options struct to the verifier for those
who prefer designated initializers to default arguments. The former
constructor is defined in terms of the latter because in old c++,
having default values for members removes list initialization, making
defining constructors in the other way a lot more challenging to write.
@dbaileychess