Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Port to use glow instead of a function call table #2060

Open
notgull opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Port to use glow instead of a function call table #2060

notgull opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@notgull
Copy link
Contributor

notgull commented Jun 23, 2023

It would be nice to be able to use this crate on web targets. As far as I know, the only portable way of doing this is to use the glow instead of a get_proc_address based approach.
@Melchizedek6809
Copy link
Member

Yeah, supporting web targets in glium would be great, do you have time to to look into adding a new glow/webgl backend to glium? I'd love to look over/merge that PR :)

@notgull
Copy link
Contributor Author

notgull commented Jun 24, 2023

This isn't high on my priorities list, so I probably won't get to it in the foreseeable future, sorry

@Melchizedek6809
Copy link
Member

Ah too bad, on second thought: it might be even better to go one level below and get glutin to support web targets, since this would help not only glium but many more projects.

@notgull notgull mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@notgull @Melchizedek6809