Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: parametrize proxy tests #836

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 24, 2020

Conversation

xavfernandez
Copy link
Contributor

While working on adding tests for an other feature, I stumbled on those tests and found it hard to check which cases were tested among the 16 present tests.

Hopefully it's easier to read in the new version.

Copy link
Member

@untitaker untitaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for working on this, I'd like one change though

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"dsn,env_http_proxy,env_https_proxy,arg_http_proxy,arg_https_proxy,expected_proxy_scheme",
[
("http://foo@sentry.io/123", None, None, "http://localhost/123", None, "http"),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if instead of these tuples we should have one parameter called testcase and pass dictionaries into the testcase. I think this is hard to read because you need to memorize which tuple index maps to which param.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done :)

@untitaker untitaker merged commit db86d61 into getsentry:master Sep 24, 2020
@untitaker
Copy link
Member

excellent, thanks!

@xavfernandez xavfernandez deleted the parametrize_proxy_tests branch September 24, 2020 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants