chore: Standardize SDKs on MIT License

[chadwhitacre]

MIT is our standard license for SDKs. This PR is part of getsentry/team-ospo#56.

Approved by Legal.

[chadwhitacre]

Hrm, this is gonna take some work actually. We have all of these sub-packages ...

[AbhiPrasad]

@chadwhitacre need us to take this over for the sub packages?

[chadwhitacre]

@AbhiPrasad That'd be awesome, actually. 🐭

package.json and LICENSE files and whatever else should be updated.

[AbhiPrasad]

Alright, went through and updated all of the subpackages, and cleaned up all the licenses so they follow the same format (the one specified here: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/pull/5993/files#diff-c693279643b8cd5d248172d9c22cb7cf4ed163a3c98c8a3f69c2717edd3eacb7)

@chadwhitacre we good to go?

[chadwhitacre]

I talked more with Legal and we should keep the copyright years unchanged for now. In the future it'd be great to have a range [start]-[current] but that should really be automated so it stays up to date, out of scope here.

[AbhiPrasad]

GHA that automatically updates every license file in a repo? 👀

With this, are we good to go? I can slam the ✅ and merge then.

[chadwhitacre]

GHA that automatically updates every license file in a repo? 👀

Something like that.

With this, are we good to go? I can slam the ✅ and merge then.

I'm good. 👍 Thanks @AbhiPrasad! 🥔

[AbhiPrasad]