Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some Sentry XML options (eg.: traces.user-interaction.enable) cause a C++ SIGSEV SIGFAULT error on API 21 #3392

Open
rolandsarosy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@rolandsarosy
Copy link

Integration

sentry-android

Build System

Gradle

AGP Version

8.2.0

Proguard

Disabled

Version

7.6.0

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Have Sentry enabled, and run it on an API 21 device.
  2. Enable the following options in XML:
        <meta-data
            android:name="io.sentry.traces.user-interaction.enable"
            android:value="true" />
        <meta-data
            android:name="io.sentry.traces.sample-rate"
            android:value="1.0" />
        <meta-data
            android:name="io.sentry.traces.profiling.sample-rate"
            android:value="1.0" />
  1. Go into your (Jetpack Compose UI) application, and start clicking on various UI elements in rapid succession. (The issue 100% happens with regular use as well, but this is the easiest way to reproduce it.)
  2. After a while, the interactions will slow down a bit, then, the crash happens.

Expected Result

Application should not cause SIGSEV C++ errors on API 21.

Actual Result

The application first slows down, then crashes with a native C++ SIGSEV SIGFAULT error. Often the crash cannot even be caught by Sentry itself. When it can be, the exception looks something like this.

You can find our exact list of libraries and more information about our setup in the stacktrace above, but I'm here to answer any questions you have too.

We first encountered this issue on our android-based PoS terminals running API 21, but we were able to reproduce the issue on an emulator running the same API level too.

If you guys are unable to reproduce this issue, I'll see if I can't procure some sort of simplifed part of the codebase to help.

Something to note (maybe?) is that we're setting up Sentry with a proxy:

        SentryAndroid.init(this) { options ->
            options.environment = BuildConfig.FLAVOR
            options.proxy = SentryOptions.Proxy(BuildConfig.SENTRY_APN_PROXY_IP, BuildConfig.SENTRY_APN_PROXY_PORT)
        }

The issue goes away as soon as we remove the 3 parts mentioned above from the Manifest.

@markushi
Copy link
Member

markushi commented May 2, 2024

Thanks for reaching out @rolandsarosy, let me try to reproduce this on our end.

@markushi markushi self-assigned this May 2, 2024
@markushi
Copy link
Member

markushi commented May 2, 2024

It looks like I can reproduce the issue on an API level 21 devices. @stefanosiano this only seems to be happening when profiling is active, have you ever encountered any API level 21 specific issues?

Logcat:

A  Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1, fault addr 0xa4c in tid 6192 (Sampling Profil)
I  *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
I  Build fingerprint: 'generic_arm64/sdk_google_phone_arm64/generic_arm64:5.0.2/LSY66K/8789838:eng/test-keys'
I  Revision: '0'
I  ABI: 'arm64'
I  pid: 6066, tid: 6192, name: Sampling Profil  >>> <app> <<<
I  signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0xa4c
I      x0   00000000002dc6c0  x1   000000000000000e  x2   0000000000000a5a  x3   0000000000000a4c
I      x4   0000000000000000  x5   000000000004459c  x6   0000000000000002  x7   000000756a4828b4
I      x8   0000000000000000  x9   000000000000000a  x10  000000000000000e  x11  000000000e54919c
I      x12  0000000000000018  x13  000000006633952e  x14  0000000000000000  x15  0000000070810bf0
I      x16  0000000000000000  x17  0000000000000a4c  x18  00000000000017b2  x19  0000000000000a4c
I      x20  000000756a482880  x21  0000000070810bf0  x22  0000000000000000  x23  0000000000000001
I      x24  0000000000000a4c  x25  000000000004459c  x26  0000007579769340  x27  0000007579774500
I      x28  000000757eefb000  x29  000000756afef910  x30  000000000070810b
I      sp   000000756afef910  pc   000000757ed98158  pstate 0000000060000000
I  
   backtrace:
I      #00 pc 0000000000310158  /system/lib64/libart.so (art::Trace::LogMethodTraceEvent(art::Thread*, art::mirror::ArtMethod*, art::instrumentation::Instrumentation::InstrumentationEvent, unsigned int, unsigned int)+284)
I      #01 pc 0000000000310704  /system/lib64/libart.so (art::Trace::CompareAndUpdateStackTrace(art::Thread*, std::__1::vector<art::mirror::ArtMethod*, std::__1::allocator<art::mirror::ArtMethod*> >*)+500)
I      #02 pc 00000000003108cc  /system/lib64/libart.so (art::GetSample(art::Thread*, void*)+100)
I      #03 pc 000000000030697c  /system/lib64/libart.so (art::ThreadList::ForEach(void (*)(art::Thread*, void*), void*)+48)
I      #04 pc 00000000003109e8  /system/lib64/libart.so (art::Trace::RunSamplingThread(void*)+236)
I      #05 pc 000000000001eab8  /system/lib64/libc.so (__pthread_start(void*)+52)
I      #06 pc 000000000001ae44  /system/lib64/libc.so (__start_thread+16)
I  
   Tombstone written to: /data/tombstones/tombstone_00

tombstone_00.txt

@markushi
Copy link
Member

markushi commented May 8, 2024

Next steps:

  • Try other API levels < 26
  • Dump native memory / log free memory right before the crash

@markushi
Copy link
Member

markushi commented May 8, 2024

I the meantime disabling user interaction tracing would at least prevent the crashes

   <meta-data
            android:name="io.sentry.traces.user-interaction.enable"
            android:value="false" />

@rolandsarosy
Copy link
Author

rolandsarosy commented May 8, 2024

Yeah, we've disabled user-interaction altogether. If the issue won't get resolved in the near future (which would be understandable as this seems like a harder-to-solve issue), we'll look into programmatically enabling/disabling user-interaction depending on API levels.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Status: Waiting for: Product Owner
Status: Needs Discussion
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants