Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release branch for pre-releasing 6.7 #2307

Merged
merged 15 commits into from Nov 4, 2022
Merged

Release branch for pre-releasing 6.7 #2307

merged 15 commits into from Nov 4, 2022

Conversation

adinauer
Copy link
Member

#skip-changelog

Merge when 6.7.0 becomes stable

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 20, 2022

Messages
📖 Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against d741807

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 20, 2022

Performance metrics 🚀

  Plain With Sentry Diff
Startup time 361.46 ms 454.94 ms 93.48 ms
Size 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 609.88 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
f809aac 301.51 ms 346.60 ms 45.09 ms
90e9745 314.68 ms 357.28 ms 42.60 ms

App size

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
f809aac 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 608.63 KiB
90e9745 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 608.63 KiB

Previous results on branch: feat/6.7.x

Startup times

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
d55e277 310.20 ms 329.74 ms 19.54 ms
843d929 341.48 ms 378.30 ms 36.82 ms
3e6c9e5 297.19 ms 340.93 ms 43.75 ms

App size

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
d55e277 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 608.49 KiB
843d929 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 607.06 KiB
3e6c9e5 1.73 MiB 2.32 MiB 608.49 KiB

@Override
@SuppressWarnings("lgtm[java/spring-disabled-csrf-protection]")
protected void configure(final @NotNull HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.csrf().disable().authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated().and().httpBasic();

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Disabled Spring CSRF protection

CSRF vulnerability due to protection being disabled.
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("lgtm[java/spring-disabled-csrf-protection]")
protected void configure(final @NotNull HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.csrf().disable().authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated().and().httpBasic();

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Disabled Spring CSRF protection

CSRF vulnerability due to protection being disabled.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 80.29% // Head: 80.36% // Increases project coverage by +0.06% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (d741807) compared to base (2826e76).
Patch coverage: 81.45% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2307      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     80.29%   80.36%   +0.06%     
- Complexity     3497     3670     +173     
============================================
  Files           250      290      +40     
  Lines         12969    13712     +743     
  Branches       1740     1801      +61     
============================================
+ Hits          10414    11020     +606     
- Misses         1897     2001     +104     
- Partials        658      691      +33     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...io/sentry/apollo3/SentryApolloBuilderExtensions.kt 50.00% <ø> (ø)
...jul/src/main/java/io/sentry/jul/SentryHandler.java 75.37% <ø> (ø)
...karta/SentrySpringServletContainerInitializer.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...racing/SentrySpanClientHttpRequestInterceptor.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...pring/jakarta/tracing/TransactionNameProvider.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/TraceContext.java 82.83% <ø> (ø)
.../java/io/sentry/vendor/gson/stream/JsonReader.java 87.51% <ø> (ø)
.../java/io/sentry/vendor/gson/stream/JsonWriter.java 85.71% <ø> (ø)
...try/spring/jakarta/webflux/SentryScheduleHook.java 12.50% <12.50%> (ø)
...sentry/spring/jakarta/RequestPayloadExtractor.java 37.50% <37.50%> (ø)
... and 37 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@adinauer adinauer marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2022 06:23
Copy link
Member

@romtsn romtsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be good, since I reviewed it already, but the checks are failing

@adinauer adinauer merged commit 43077c0 into main Nov 4, 2022
@adinauer adinauer deleted the feat/6.7.x branch November 4, 2022 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants