New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sentry support for Blazor WebAssembly #2021
Comments
We have a sample in the repo: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-dotnet/tree/23be90cd6b57446f7bbfeecc7c5f30eb692999fc/samples/Sentry.Samples.AspNetCore.Blazor.Wasm But indeed no docs at the time. That said, support is there, it's just .NET running on Wasm (MonoAOT afaik). User Feedback would require you to call the C# API. If you're using the JS widget, you'd need to do JS interop to pass around the event id. But it should work too. |
Can we get some support docs for Blazer Server Side? |
I played a bit during hackweek. Some learnings/ideas: Stuff I explored in the draft PR above
WebAssembly error monitoring
Blazor ServerLots to explore here. Since we have decent support with the
Performance monitoring
Profiling
|
.NET 8 introduces |
Weird that they separate out .NET and C#... I wonder what the results would look like if those two were grouped together (who is using C# but not .NET??? How could less people be using .NET and C#?). |
How to emit source maps: |
Is there any timeline on a proper Blazor SDK? The current situation is not really satisfying since Sentry in Blazor WASM using the existing SDKs misses out on all the cool features like replays and profiling. |
As a very soft ETA, we would like to be able to support this sometime within the next quarter. |
Problem Statement
This is a feature request for support for Blazor WebAssembly. According to #317, there seems to be at least some level of integration supported, but I couldn't find any installation tutorial. I would love to see support including features like User Feedback Prompt or Tunneling.
Solution Brainstorm
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: