You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I am a developer with a keen interest in Fortio. Currently, I am exploring the application of Fortio in various scenarios, particularly in terms of security and data transmission efficiency. Therefore, I have the following questions and would appreciate the community's help and guidance:
Is there any consideration within the community to support the QUIC protocol in future releases? Given the advantages of QUIC in terms of transmission efficiency and security, I am interested in the community's stance on this.
I am looking forward to the community's feedback on these potential future directions. If there are no current plans but there is interest in the community, I am also very willing to participate in the related development work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rfcgpt
changed the title
Inquiry About Future Plans for Supporting mTLS Authentication and QUIC Protocol in Fortio
Inquiry About Future Plans for Supporting QUIC Protocol in Fortio
Dec 16, 2023
Sounds like a discussion/question more than an issue, but the short answer is, like h2 and h2c current support, once quic is exposed in golang base library we can add it/make it an option (h3 that is)
Hello! I am a developer with a keen interest in Fortio. Currently, I am exploring the application of Fortio in various scenarios, particularly in terms of security and data transmission efficiency. Therefore, I have the following questions and would appreciate the community's help and guidance:
I am looking forward to the community's feedback on these potential future directions. If there are no current plans but there is interest in the community, I am also very willing to participate in the related development work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: