Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix return tag on processSvg #946

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

rdimascio
Copy link
Contributor

The @returns line for the processSvg function was using @param

The `@returns` line for the `processSvg` function was using `@param`
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #946 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #946   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            5         5           
  Lines           34        34           
  Branches         3         3           
=========================================
  Hits            34        34           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8263ca9...19866bb. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@colebemis colebemis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch. Thank you, @rdimascio!

@colebemis colebemis merged commit 734f3f5 into feathericons:master Sep 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants