Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get eval results from metadata #597

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

flying-sheep
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #596

No idea how to elegantly pass the SyntaxNode all the way down to the role, and I’m not super interested in figuring that out, it’s your call how to implement that.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.98%. Comparing base (af2d197) to head (6d8447d).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Current head 6d8447d differs from pull request most recent head ba91962

Please upload reports for the commit ba91962 to get more accurate results.

Files Patch % Lines
myst_nb/core/execute/base.py 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
myst_nb/core/execute/inline.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #597      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.97%   80.98%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        2702     2714      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         2188     2198      +10     
- Misses        514      516       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 80.98% <89.47%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Contributor Author

@agoose77 is there a way this can make it into this week’s release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

{eval}thing does not work with nb_execution_mode == 'off'
2 participants