New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release version 1.0.0 #295
Comments
Strong points all around. There is a 1.0.0 milestone here: https://github.com/geemus/excon/issues?milestone=1&page=1&state=open. I haven't been making a particular concerted effort there though and some of it may be out of date. I just thought there might yet be some potentially breaking changes to get out of the way before the 1.0.0 stamp went on it. I'll try to start making some time to move this forward again though, as I agree it is rather long overdue. |
This issue has been automatically marked stale due to inactivity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Copying over comments from #570. Two breaking changes that I'd be happy to see:
There are probably other changes for 3.0 that you'd want to add. For example, perhaps there are some rarely used parts of the library that could be removed? Looking forward to 1.0! |
@sandstrom good call (looks like the copy didn't work though). Thanks! |
@sandstrom now I see the rest of the comment. Yes, dropping earlier ruby support makes a ton of sense. I've added the |
Excon turn 4 years old at the end of this month. Many popular gems (notably
fog
) depend on Excon. Seems like it's about time to declare a stable, public API.From the SemVer FAQ:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: