You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My testnet bee nodes quit participating in the storage-incentives because they are showing a non-zero sync rate, but yet the reserve size reported by depthmonitor is not changing.
Expected behavior
If the reserve is not changing size, I would expect the node to consider itself synced and participate in the storage incentives Schelling game.
Actual behavior
The node stops participating with a non-zero sync rate.
Steps to reproduce
Just watch the depthmonitor logs for a non-zero rate but yet a non-changing reserve size.
Possible solution
Only consider the sync rate of chunks that are within the current reserve radius instead of all pulled chunks which are currently based on the kademlia radius which is smaller and results in an inappropriate pull sync rate preventing storage incentives.
Context
bee 1.10 rc*
Summary
My testnet bee nodes quit participating in the storage-incentives because they are showing a non-zero sync rate, but yet the reserve size reported by depthmonitor is not changing.
Expected behavior
If the reserve is not changing size, I would expect the node to consider itself synced and participate in the storage incentives Schelling game.
Actual behavior
The node stops participating with a non-zero sync rate.
Steps to reproduce
Just watch the depthmonitor logs for a non-zero rate but yet a non-changing reserve size.
Possible solution
Only consider the sync rate of chunks that are within the current reserve radius instead of all pulled chunks which are currently based on the kademlia radius which is smaller and results in an inappropriate pull sync rate preventing storage incentives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: