docs: clarify no-control-regex rule #15808
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mdjermanovic
added
rule
btmills
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
crapStone
pushed a commit
to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2022
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [eslint](https://eslint.org) ([source](https://github.com/eslint/eslint)) | devDependencies | minor | [`8.14.0` -> `8.15.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/eslint/8.14.0/8.15.0) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>eslint/eslint</summary> ### [`v8.15.0`](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/releases/v8.15.0) [Compare Source](eslint/eslint@v8.14.0...v8.15.0) #### Features - [`ab37d3b`](eslint/eslint@ab37d3b) feat: add `enforceInClassFields` option to no-underscore-dangle ([#​15818](eslint/eslint#15818)) (Roberto Cestari) #### Bug Fixes - [`8bf9440`](eslint/eslint@8bf9440) fix: "use strict" should not trigger strict mode in ES3 ([#​15846](eslint/eslint#15846)) (Milos Djermanovic) #### Documentation - [`28116cc`](eslint/eslint@28116cc) docs: update AST node names link in no-restricted-syntax ([#​15843](eslint/eslint#15843)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`272965f`](eslint/eslint@272965f) docs: fix h1 heading on formatters page ([#​15834](eslint/eslint#15834)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`a798166`](eslint/eslint@a798166) docs: update example for running individual rule tests ([#​15833](eslint/eslint#15833)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`57e732b`](eslint/eslint@57e732b) docs: mark `SourceCode#getJSDocComment` deprecated in working-with-rules ([#​15829](eslint/eslint#15829)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`9a90abf`](eslint/eslint@9a90abf) docs: update docs directory in working-with-rules ([#​15830](eslint/eslint#15830)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`810adda`](eslint/eslint@810adda) docs: add more examples for prefer-object-spread ([#​15831](eslint/eslint#15831)) (coderaiser) - [`06b1edb`](eslint/eslint@06b1edb) docs: clarify no-control-regex rule ([#​15808](eslint/eslint#15808)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`9ecd42f`](eslint/eslint@9ecd42f) docs: Fixed typo in code comment ([#​15812](eslint/eslint#15812)) (Addison G) - [`de992b7`](eslint/eslint@de992b7) docs: remove links to 2fa document ([#​15804](eslint/eslint#15804)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`5222659`](eslint/eslint@5222659) docs: fix 'Related Rules' heading in no-constant-binary-expression ([#​15799](eslint/eslint#15799)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`e70ae81`](eslint/eslint@e70ae81) docs: Update README team and sponsors (ESLint Jenkins) #### Chores - [`1ba6a92`](eslint/eslint@1ba6a92) chore: upgrade [@​eslint/eslintrc](https://github.com/eslint/eslintrc)[@​1](https://github.com/1).2.3 ([#​15847](eslint/eslint#15847)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`8167aa7`](eslint/eslint@8167aa7) chore: bump version of minimatch due to security issue PRISMA-2022-0039 ([#​15774](eslint/eslint#15774)) (Jan Opravil) - [`b8995a4`](eslint/eslint@b8995a4) chore: Implement docs site ([#​15815](eslint/eslint#15815)) (Nicholas C. Zakas) - [`6494e3e`](eslint/eslint@6494e3e) chore: update link in `codeql-analysis.yml` ([#​15817](eslint/eslint#15817)) (Milos Djermanovic) - [`36503ec`](eslint/eslint@36503ec) chore: enable no-constant-binary-expression in eslint-config-eslint ([#​15807](eslint/eslint#15807)) (唯然) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox. --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1343 Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
srijan-deepsource
pushed a commit
to DeepSourceCorp/eslint
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2022
* docs: clarify no-control-regex rule Fixes eslint#15653 * fix escaped
srijan-deepsource
added a commit
to DeepSourceCorp/eslint
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2022
This reverts commit 0c08be5.
eslint-github-bot
bot
added
the
archived due to age
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
Fixes #15653
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Updated documentation for
no-control-regexto clarify the purpose of this rule.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?