Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove unused parameter in linter.js #15451

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 25, 2021

Conversation

mdjermanovic
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites checklist

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)

[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[x] Other, please explain:

Removes unused parameter filename from function getDirectiveComments in linter.js.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Removed the unused parameter.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

It seems that filename was unused from the start (function getDirectiveComments was added in 558ccba).

no-unused-vars didn't report this because we have args: "after-used".

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic added accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion chore This change is not user-facing labels Dec 24, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@snitin315 snitin315 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aladdin-add aladdin-add merged commit 28e907a into main Dec 25, 2021
@aladdin-add aladdin-add deleted the getdirectivecomments-unused-filename branch December 25, 2021 12:10
@eslint-github-bot eslint-github-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2022
@eslint-github-bot eslint-github-bot bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants