Fix: fails the test case if autofix made syntax error (fixes #11615) #11798
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[X] Bug fix #11615
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This PR fixes
RuleTester
to fail the test case if autofix made syntax errors.Additionally,
RuleTester.describe
andRuleTester.it
permanently intests/lib/rule-tester/rule-tester.js
. This side-effect had confusedtests/lib/rules/*.js
as using the stub functions to test rules.I have noticed that
errors
property with a number allows syntax errors. Some of our tests depend on the behavior in order to use syntax error in rule's tests (E.g. tests/lib/rules/spaced-comment.js#L577-L589). I'm not sure if it's intentional, but I left it as is.I wonder if we should deprecate the
errors
property with a number. It causes false negatives such as tests/lib/rules/complexity.js#L84.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing in particular.