Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: make config validator params more consistent #11435

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2019

Conversation

aladdin-add
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
move the function param source to be last, and defaults to null.
since it's not always necessary, as in some of the tests.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
no

@aladdin-add aladdin-add added evaluating The team will evaluate this issue to decide whether it meets the criteria for inclusion chore This change is not user-facing labels Feb 23, 2019
Copy link
Member

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@btmills btmills merged commit 0f56dc6 into eslint:master Mar 15, 2019
@aladdin-add aladdin-add deleted the chore/validator branch March 21, 2019 03:47
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2019
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Sep 12, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing evaluating The team will evaluate this issue to decide whether it meets the criteria for inclusion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants