Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Ignore empty statements in no-unreachable (fixes #9081) #11058

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 8, 2018

Conversation

nzakas
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas commented Nov 6, 2018

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[ ] Documentation update
[x] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Made no-unreachable ignore EmptyStatement nodes.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Was this the correct approach?

@nzakas nzakas added bug ESLint is working incorrectly rule Relates to ESLint's core rules labels Nov 6, 2018
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems good to me!

Copy link
Member

@mysticatea mysticatea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this fix!

But I think that the right approach is another one: delete L188.

lib/rules/no-unreachable.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nzakas
Copy link
Member Author

nzakas commented Nov 7, 2018

Should be all set now.

Copy link
Member

@mysticatea mysticatea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@mysticatea mysticatea merged commit dcc6233 into master Nov 8, 2018
@mysticatea mysticatea deleted the issue9081 branch November 8, 2018 01:38
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 8, 2019
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label May 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion bug ESLint is working incorrectly rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants