Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: make separateRequires work in consecutive mode (fixes #10784) #10886

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 28, 2018
Merged

Fix: make separateRequires work in consecutive mode (fixes #10784) #10886

merged 2 commits into from Sep 28, 2018

Conversation

g-plane
Copy link
Member

@g-plane g-plane commented Sep 23, 2018

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Bug fix (template)

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Fixes #10784

@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon label Sep 23, 2018
@g-plane g-plane changed the title Fix: make separateRequires does work in consecutive mode (fixes #10784) Fix: make separateRequires work in consecutive mode (fixes #10784) Sep 23, 2018
@aladdin-add aladdin-add added bug ESLint is working incorrectly rule Relates to ESLint's core rules accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion and removed triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon labels Sep 23, 2018
Copy link
Member

@aladdin-add aladdin-add left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, just a small nitpick. thanks!

@@ -384,8 +384,13 @@ module.exports = {
if (nodeIndex > 0) {
const previousNode = parent.body[nodeIndex - 1];
const isPreviousNodeDeclaration = previousNode.type === "VariableDeclaration";
const declarationsWithPrevious = declarations.concat(isPreviousNodeDeclaration && previousNode.declarations);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: if isPreviousNodeDeclaration being false, it could be pushed to declarations. can we change it to something like:

const declarationsWithPrevious = declarations.concat(previousNode.declarations || []);

Copy link
Member

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit 9432b10 into eslint:master Sep 28, 2018
@g-plane g-plane deleted the fix-one-var branch September 29, 2018 10:07
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2019
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Mar 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion bug ESLint is working incorrectly rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'one-var': separateRequires does not work in consecutive mode
3 participants