Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Use ergebnis/test-util instead of localheinz/test-util #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 7, 2019

Conversation

localheinz
Copy link
Member

This PR

  • uses ergebnis/test-util instead of localheinz/test-util

@localheinz localheinz self-assigned this Dec 7, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #10 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             master    #10   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage       100%   100%           
  Complexity        8      8           
=======================================
  Files             2      2           
  Lines            26     26           
=======================================
  Hits             26     26

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a941255...a3c1cdb. Read the comment docs.

@localheinz localheinz merged commit 55a05e9 into master Dec 7, 2019
@localheinz localheinz deleted the feature/test-util branch December 7, 2019 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant