Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] CertGenUtilsTests testIsAnyLocalAddress failing #86507

Closed
iverase opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

[CI] CertGenUtilsTests testIsAnyLocalAddress failing #86507

iverase opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
:Security/Security Security issues without another label Team:Security Meta label for security team >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI

Comments

@iverase
Copy link
Contributor

iverase commented May 6, 2022

Maybe it is JDK19 dependant

Build scan:
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/s/oupe47n52do7i/tests/:x-pack:plugin:security:cli:test/org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.cli.CertGenUtilsTests/testIsAnyLocalAddress

Reproduction line:
./gradlew ':x-pack:plugin:security:cli:test' --tests "org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.cli.CertGenUtilsTests.testIsAnyLocalAddress" -Dtests.seed=6345036800B8DE26 -Dtests.locale=it -Dtests.timezone=America/Argentina/Tucuman -Druntime.java=19

Applicable branches:
master

Reproduces locally?:
No

Failure history:
https://gradle-enterprise.elastic.co/scans/tests?tests.container=org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.cli.CertGenUtilsTests&tests.test=testIsAnyLocalAddress

Failure excerpt:

org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: 
Cannot mock/spy class java.net.InetAddress
Mockito cannot mock/spy because :
 - sealed class

  at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6345036800B8DE26:389C19474BE8FF6D]:0)
  at org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.cli.CertGenUtilsTests.testIsAnyLocalAddress(CertGenUtilsTests.java:104)
  at jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1758)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:946)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:982)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:996)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:824)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:475)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:955)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:840)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:891)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:902)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
  at org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:375)
  at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:831)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:828)

@iverase iverase added :Security/Security Security issues without another label >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI labels May 6, 2022
@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Security Meta label for security team label May 6, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-security (Team:Security)

@slobodanadamovic
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as duplicate of #86418

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Security/Security Security issues without another label Team:Security Meta label for security team >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants