Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Recommend simpleConnectionPool for Cloud #1193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 2, 2022
Merged

Conversation

toby-sutor
Copy link
Contributor

As per #918 (comment) and https://elastic.slack.com/archives/CH37CF39S/p1643707941052409 we recommend using the simpleConnectionPool when there is a proxy or load balancer in place. This applies to Elasticsearch Service and ECE (Cloud). Hence the comments need to be updated.

As per #918 (comment) and https://elastic.slack.com/archives/CH37CF39S/p1643707941052409 we recommend using the `simpleConnectionPool` when there is a proxy or load balancer in place. This applies to Elasticsearch Service and ECE (Cloud). Hence the comments need to be updated.
@ezimuel ezimuel merged commit 3cab97a into master Feb 2, 2022
@ezimuel
Copy link
Contributor

ezimuel commented Feb 2, 2022

Thanks @toby-sutor

ezimuel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
As per #918 (comment) and https://elastic.slack.com/archives/CH37CF39S/p1643707941052409 we recommend using the `simpleConnectionPool` when there is a proxy or load balancer in place. This applies to Elasticsearch Service and ECE (Cloud). Hence the comments need to be updated.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants